Sunday, June 4, 2023

Insecure Features In PDFs

In 2019, we published attacks on PDF Signatures and PDF Encryption. During our research and studying the related work, we discovered a lot of blog posts, talks, and papers focusing on malicious PDFs causing some damage. However, there was no systematic analysis of all possible dangerous features supported by PDFs, but only isolated exploits and attack concepts.

We decided to fill this gap and systematize the possibilities to use legitimate PDF features and do bad stuff. We define four attack categories: Denial of Service, Information Disclosure, Data Manipulation, and Code Execution.

Our evaluation reveals 26 of 28 popular PDF processing applications are vulnerable to at least one attack. You can download all malicious PDFs here. You can also find more technical details in our NDSS'21 paper.

This is a joined work of Jens Müller, Dominik Noss, Christian Mainka, Vladislav Mladenov, and Jörg Schwenk.

Dangerous Paths: Overview

To identify attack vectors, we systematically surveyed which potentially dangerous features exist in the PDF specification. We created a comprehensive list with all PDF Actions that can be called. This list contains 18 different actions that we carefully studied.
 
 
We selected eight actions – the ones that directly or indirectly allow access to a file handle and may therefore be abused for dangerous features such as URL invocation or writing to files. Having a list of security-sensitive actions, we proceeded by investigating all objects and related events that can trigger these actions.

We identified four PDF objects which allow calling arbitrary actions (Page, Annotation, Field, and Catalog). Most objects offer multiple alternatives for this purpose. For example, the Catalog object, defines the OpenAction or additional actions (AA) events. Each event can launch any sequence of PDF actions, for example, Launch, Thread, etc. JavaScript actions can be embedded within documents. It  opens a new area for attacks, for example, new annotations can be created that can have actions which once again lead to accessing file handles.

Denial of Service

The goal of the denial of service class of attacks is enforcing to process PDF applications in consuming all available resources (i.e., computing time or memory) or causes them to crash by opening a specially crafted PDF document. We identified two variants: Infinite Loop and Deflate Bomb.

Infinite Loop

This variant induces an endless loop causing the program execution to get stuck. The PDF standard allows various elements of the document structure to reference to themselves, or to other elements of the same type.

  • Action loop: PDF actions allow to specify a Next action to be performed, thereby resulting in "action cycles".
  • ObjStm loop: Object streams may extend other object streams allows the crafting of a document with cycles.
  • Outline loop: PDF documents may contain an outline. Its entries, however, can refer to themselves or each other.
  • Calculations: PDF defines "Type 4" calculator functions, for example, to transform colors. Processing hard-to-solve mathematical formulas may lead to high demands of CPU.
  • JavaScript: Finally, in case the PDF application processes scripts within documents, infinite loops can be induced.

Deflate Bomb

Data amplification attacks based on malicious zip archives are well-known. The first publicly documented DoS attack using a "zip bomb" was conducted in 1996 against a Fidonet BBS administrator. However, not only zip files but also stream objects within PDF documents can be compressed using various algorithms such as Deflate to reduce the overall file size. 

Information Disclosure

The goal of this class of attacks is to track the usage of a document by silently invoking a connection to the attacker's server once the file is opened, or to leak PDF document form data, local files, or NTLM credentials to the attacker.

URL Invocation

PDF documents that silently "phone home" should be considered as privacy-invasive. They can be used, for example, to deanonymize reviewers, journalists, or activists behind a shared mailbox. The attack's goal is to open a backchannel to an attacker-controlled server once the PDF file is opened by the victim.

The possibility of malicious URI resolving in PDF documents has been introduced by Hamon [1] who gave an evaluation for URI and SubmitForm actions in Acrobat Reader. We extend their analysis to all standard PDF features that allow opening a URL, such as ImportData, Launch, GoToR, and JavaScript.

Form Data Leakage

Documents can contain forms to be filled out by the user – a feature introduced with PDF version 1.2 in 1996 and used on a daily basis for routine offices tasks, such as travel authorization or vacation requests. The idea of this attack is as follows: The victim downloads a form – a PDF document which contains form fields – from an attacker controlled source and fills it out on the screen, for example, in order to print it. The form is manipulated by the attacker in such a way that it silently send input data to the attacker's server.

Local File Leakage

The PDF standard defines various methods to embed external files into a document or otherwise access files on the host's file system, as documented below.

  • External streams: Documents can contain stream objects (e.g., images) to be included from external files on disk.
  • Reference XObjects: This feature allows a document to import content from another (external) PDF document.
  • Open Prepress Interface: Before printing a document, local files can be defined as low-resolution placeholders.
  • Forms Data Format (FDF): Interactive form data can be stored in, and auto-imported from, external FDF files.
  • JavaScript functions: The Adobe JavaScript reference enables documents to read data from or import local files.

If a malicious document managed to firstly read files from the victim's disk and secondly, send them back to the attacker, such behavior would arguably be critical.

Credential Theft

In 1997, Aaron Spangler posted a vulnerability in Windows NT on the Bugtraq mailing list [2]: Any client program can trigger a connection to a rogue SMB server. If the server requests authentication, Windows will automatically try to log in with a hash of the user's credentials. Such captured NTLM hashes allow for efficient offline cracking and can be re-used by applying pass-the-hash or relay attacks to authenticate under the user's identity. In April 2018, Check Point Research [3] showed that similar attacks can be performed with malicious PDF files. They found that the target of GoToR and GoToE actions can be set to \\attacker.com\dummyfile, thereby leaking credentials in the form of NTLM hashes.

Data Manipulation

This attack class deals with the capabilities of malicious documents to silently modify form data, to write to local files on the host's file system, or to show a different content based on the application that is used to open the document.

Form Modification

The idea of this attack is as follows: Similar to Form Data Leakage attacks, the victim obtains a harmlessly looking PDF document from an attacker controlled source, for example, a remittance slip or a tax form. The goal of the attacker is to dynamically, and without knowledge of the victim, manipulate form field data.

File Write Access

The PDF standard enables documents to submit form data to external webservers. Technically the webserver's URL is defined using a PDF File Specification. This ambiguity in the standard may be interpreted by implementations in such a way that they enable documents to submit PDF form data to a local file, thereby writing to this file.
 

Content Masking 

The goal of this attack is to craft a document that renders differently, depending on the applied PDF interpreter. This can be used, for example, to show different content to different reviewers, to trick content filters (AI-based machines as well as human content moderators), plagiarism detection software, or search engines, which index a different text than the one shown to users when opening the document.

  • Stream confusion: It is unclear how content streams are parsed if their Length value does not match the offset of the endstream marker, or if syntax errors are introduced.
  • Object confusion: An object can overlay another object. The second object may not be processed if it has a duplicate object number, if it is not listed in the XRef table, or if other structural syntax errors are introduced.
  • Document confusion: A PDF file can contain yet another document (e.g., as embedded file), multiple XRef tables, etc., which results in ambiguities on the structural level.
  • PDF confusion: Objects before the PDF header or after an EOF marker may be processed by implementations, introducing ambiguities in the outer document structure.

Code Execution

The goal of this attack is to execute attacker-controlled code. This can be achieved by silently launching an executable file, embedded within the document, to infect the host with malware. The PDF specification defines the Launch action, which allows documents to launch arbitrary applications. The file to be launched can either be specified by a local path, a network share, a URL, or a file embedded within the PDF document itself.

Evaluation

Out of 28 tested applications, 26 are vulnerable to at least one attack.

Authors of this Post

Dominik Noss
Christian Mainka

Sources

1] V. Hamon. "Malicious URI resolving in PDF documents". In: Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques 9.2 (2013), pp. 65–76.

[2] Aaron Spangler. WinNT/Win95 Automatic Authentication Vulnerability (IE Bug #4). https://insecure.org/sploits/winnt.automatic.authentication.html. Mar. 1997.

[3] Check Point Research. NTLM Credentials Theft via PDF Files. https://research.checkpoint.com/ntlm-credentials-theft-via-pdf-files/. 2018.



Related word


  1. Hacking Tools For Games
  2. Github Hacking Tools
  3. Pentest Tools Url Fuzzer
  4. What Are Hacking Tools
  5. Pentest Tools Nmap
  6. Hacker Tools For Mac
  7. Hacker Tools Linux
  8. Hacker Tools Linux
  9. Hacker
  10. Hacker Hardware Tools
  11. Growth Hacker Tools
  12. Termux Hacking Tools 2019
  13. Hack Tools For Pc
  14. Game Hacking
  15. Hack Tools
  16. Usb Pentest Tools
  17. Pentest Tools Kali Linux
  18. Pentest Tools For Windows
  19. Pentest Tools Subdomain
  20. Pentest Tools Subdomain
  21. Hacking Tools Online
  22. Hacker Search Tools
  23. Hacker Tools For Windows
  24. Hacking Tools Github
  25. Pentest Tools Github
  26. Nsa Hack Tools
  27. Hack Rom Tools
  28. Hacking Tools For Windows Free Download
  29. Pentest Reporting Tools
  30. Hack Tools For Mac
  31. Pentest Tools Windows
  32. Hacker
  33. Hacker Tools
  34. Pentest Tools Tcp Port Scanner
  35. Hacker Tools Windows
  36. Hacking Tools Github
  37. Hack Tools For Ubuntu
  38. Hacker Tools 2020
  39. Hacking Tools For Kali Linux
  40. Best Hacking Tools 2020
  41. Hacking Tools Download
  42. Hack Apps
  43. Hacking Apps
  44. Hacker Tools Software
  45. New Hack Tools
  46. Hacks And Tools
  47. How To Install Pentest Tools In Ubuntu
  48. Top Pentest Tools
  49. Hacking Tools For Games
  50. Hacking Tools Mac
  51. Pentest Tools Nmap
  52. Pentest Tools Windows
  53. Best Pentesting Tools 2018
  54. Hack Tool Apk
  55. Hack Tools
  56. Hacking Tools For Windows
  57. Pentest Tools Find Subdomains
  58. Hack Tool Apk
  59. Hack Tools For Windows
  60. Github Hacking Tools
  61. Pentest Tools List
  62. Nsa Hacker Tools
  63. Hack Tools For Games
  64. Pentest Tools Open Source
  65. Blackhat Hacker Tools
  66. Hacking Tools Name
  67. Pentest Tools Website Vulnerability
  68. Hacking Tools For Beginners
  69. Game Hacking
  70. Pentest Tools Nmap
  71. Hacker Tool Kit
  72. Black Hat Hacker Tools
  73. World No 1 Hacker Software
  74. Hacker Tools Linux
  75. Hack Tools Download
  76. Hack Tools For Mac
  77. Hacking Tools Software
  78. Hack Tools Online
  79. Hack Apps
  80. Pentest Tools Windows
  81. Hacker Tools 2019
  82. Pentest Automation Tools
  83. What Are Hacking Tools
  84. Pentest Tools For Ubuntu
  85. Hacking Tools Usb
  86. Hacking Tools For Pc
  87. Hacking Tools For Games
  88. Pentest Tools Online
  89. Hacking Tools 2020
  90. Pentest Tools Find Subdomains
  91. How To Install Pentest Tools In Ubuntu
  92. Hack Tools
  93. Pentest Tools Url Fuzzer
  94. Computer Hacker
  95. Pentest Tools Website
  96. Hack Apps
  97. Pentest Tools Linux
  98. Hacker Tools Apk Download
  99. Pentest Tools Kali Linux
  100. Hacker Tools
  101. Hack Tools Pc
  102. Hacker Tools List
  103. Hacking Tools Name
  104. Pentest Box Tools Download
  105. Hacking Tools Online
  106. Pentest Tools Find Subdomains
  107. Hack Tools
  108. Black Hat Hacker Tools
  109. Easy Hack Tools
  110. Hack Tool Apk No Root
  111. Hacking Tools Mac
  112. Hack Tools
  113. Pentest Tools Tcp Port Scanner
  114. Hacker Tools For Pc
  115. Pentest Tools For Android
  116. Hacking Tools Download
  117. Hacker Tools Apk Download
  118. Hacker Security Tools
  119. Pentest Tools Review
  120. Hacking App
  121. Hacker Tools For Pc
  122. Pentest Tools Website
  123. Hacker Tools Hardware
  124. Best Pentesting Tools 2018
  125. Hacker Tools Github
  126. Hacker Search Tools
  127. Hacker Tools Mac
  128. Pentest Tools Tcp Port Scanner
  129. Hacker Techniques Tools And Incident Handling
  130. Hacking Tools Download
  131. Hack Tools For Games
  132. Hacking Tools For Windows Free Download
  133. Pentest Tools Free
  134. Pentest Tools For Ubuntu

No comments: